Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services and the Emergence of Infectious Diseases (EID): a “one health” approach on brazilian agriculture governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18226/22370021.v12.n2.03

Keywords:

one health, ecosystem services, biodiversity, agriculture governance, Amazon deforestation, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The ecosystem services are the benefits that people obtain of the ecosystems and biodiversity. They are currently “invisible” to the market and to the agricultural public policies in force in Brazil. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of these services in the containment of pandemics, and thus to include them in the decision-making processes of the Brazilian agricultural sector. The “one health” approach will allow us to evaluate the relevance of biodiversity and ecosystem services for agricultural governance and policies. Brazil has seven major biomes: Amazon, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Pantanal, Pampa and the coastal/marine biome. They harbour exuberant biodiversity but have been converted rapidly into agricultural and livestock production areas. In total, 500,000 km² of Brazilian ecosystems were lost between 2000 and 2018, an area the size of Spain. With the expansion of the agricultural frontier over ecosystems, important ecosystem services have been lost, and among those are health risk regulation services, in particular infectious disease regulation services. In addition to the losses in terms of Natural Capital, the degradation of ecosystems favors the emergence of infectious diseases (EID), including zoonoses with pandemic potential. Climate change, biodiversity loss and the collapse of ecosystem services, coupled with an increasingly vulnerable population are the primary drivers of EIDs. Amazon deforestation can therefore cause a “perfect storm” as it provides the link between the factors necessary for the emergence of infectious diseases that can threaten global health. It is urgent to include biodiversity and ecosystem services in the accounting of Brazilian agriculture governance in order to avoid new pandemics and losses in the Natural Capital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexandre Altmann, Universidade de Caxias do Sul

Doctor (Law Faculty, University of Coimbra, Portugal). Lecturer in Environmental Law (Post-Graduate on Environment Law, University of Caxias do Sul, Brasil). E-mail: aaltmann@ucs.brFunding: this material is based upon research work funded under the MOPGA Program by the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and managed by Campus France  

References

ANDREAZZI, Cecilia Siliansky de; BRANDÃO, Martha Lima; BUENO, Marina Galvão; WINCK, Gisele R., ROCHA, Fabiana Lopes; RAIMUNDO, Rafael L. G.; METZGER, Jean Paul; CHAME, Marcia; CORDEIRO, José Luis Passos; D’ANDREA, Paulo Sérgio. 2020. Brazil’s COVID-19 response. [Correspondence]. Lancet, Vol 396 September 19, 2020.

BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS – IBGE. 2020. Ecosystem accounts: land use in Brazilian biomes: 2000-2018. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Available https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101753.pdf.

BONILLA-ALDANA, Katterine; SUAREZ, José Antonio; FRANCO-PAREDES, Carlos; VILCARROMERO, Stalin; MATTAR, Salim; GOMEZ-MARIN, Jorge E.; VILLAMIL-GÓMEZ, Wilmer E.; RUÍZ-SÁENZ, Julián; CARDONA-OSPINA, Jaime A.; IDARRAGA-BEDOYA, Samuel E.; GARCÍA-BUSTOS, Juan Javier; JIMENEZ-POSADA, Erika V.; RODRÍGUEZ-MORALES, Alfonso J.. (2019). Brazil burning! What is the potential impact of the Amazon wildfires on vector-borne and zoonotic emerging diseases? – A statement from an international experts meeting. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, Volume 31, 2019,101474, ISSN 1477-8939, Avaible https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.101474.

BURGEL, Caroline Ferri; ALTMANN, Alexandre. (2022). Recognizing and valuing the environmental services provided by traditional communities and indigenous peoples in the context of the climate and ecosystem crisis: perspectives from the National Policy of Payments for Environmental Services. In: 27th Brazilian Congress on Environmental Law [Proceedings] São Paulo: Law for a Green Planet Institute.

CENTERS OF DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION – CDC/USA. (2022). One Health basics. Avaible https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/index.html#:~:text=CDC%20uses%20a%20One%20Health,%2C%20plants%2C%20and%20the%20environment.

COMMON INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES – CICES. (2018). Guidence V5.1. Avaible: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdfDIAZ, S.. [and many others] (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 1-16. ISSN 1877-3435. Avaible: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

ELLWANGER, Joel Henrique; CHIES, José Artur B. (2020). Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. Biological Sciences. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 92 (01) Avaible: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202020191375

ELLWANGER, Joel Henrique; CHIES, José Artur B. (2021). Zoonotic spillover: Understanding basic aspects for better prevention. Genet Mol Biol. 2021 Jun 4;44(1 Suppl 1):e20200355. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0355

EVALUATION FRANÇAISE DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES ET DES SERVICES ÉCOSYSTÉMIQUES – EFESE. (2017). Cadre conceptuel. Fundation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité. Avaible: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/Thema%20-%20Efese%20-%20Le%20cadre%20conceptuel.pdfHM

TREASURY. (2022). The Green Book: Central Government Guidance On Appraisal And Evaluation. Avaible: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent

JONES, K.; PATEL, N., LEVY, M. et al. (2008). Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature451, 990–993. Avaible: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06536

L’INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE POUR L’AGRICULTURE, L’ALIMENTATION ET L’ENVIRONNEMENT – INRAE (2022). One Health – une seule santé. Avaible https://www.inrae.fr/alimentation-sante-globale/one-health-seule-sante

LOVEJOY, Thomas E.; NOBRE, Carlos. “Amazon Tipping Point: last chance for action.” (Editorial). Science Advances, vol. 4, 2, 21/II/2018, 2020. Disponível: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338097410_Amazon_tipping_point_Last_chance_for_action Acesso 12 de abril de 2022.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. Avaible: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfMONGBAY (2020). Road projects in the Amazon could deforest 2.4 million hectares in the next 20 years. Available https://brasil.mongabay.com/2020/04/projetos-de-estradas-na-amazonia-podem-desmatar-24-milhoes-de-hectares-nos-proximos-20-anos/ Accessed: 02. Dez. 2021.

MORAND S; LAJAUNIE C. (2021) Outbreaks of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases Are Associated With Changes in Forest Cover and Oil Palm Expansion at Global Scale. Front. Vet. Sci. 8:661063. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.661063

OVIEDO, Antônio; AUGUSTO, Cícero; LIMA, William Augusto. (2021). Connections between the CAR, deforestation and the land grab in protected áreas and public forests. [Technical report concern to the Bill 2.633/2020. Brasília: Socio-environmental Institute.

SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (INSTITUTO SOCIOAMBIENTAL – ISA) (2021a). More radical, new text of the ‘Land Grabbing Bill’ may be voted in the plenary of the House of Representatives this Wednesday (14/7). Available https://www.socioambiental.org/pt-br/noticias-socioambientais/mais-radical-novo-texto-do-pl-da-grilagem-pode-ser-votado-no-plenario-da-camara-nesta-quarta-147. Accessed 12/02/2021.

SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (INSTITUTO SOCIOAMBIENTAL – ISA). (2021). Even before being approved, the PL da Grilagem is destroying the Amazon. Available: https://www.socioambiental.org/pt-br/noticias-socioambientais/mesmo-antes-de-aprovado-pl-da-grilagem-esta-destruindo-a-amazonia. Accessed: 12. Fev. 2021.

THE ECONOMICS OF ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY – TEEB (2010). Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Earthscan, London and Washington. Avaible: http://doc.teebweb.org/wpcontent/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis %20Report%202010.pdf

UNITED KINGDOM NATIONAL ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT – UK-NEA. (2011). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC. Cambridge. Avaible: http://uknea.unepwcmc.org/Resources/tabid/82/Default.aspx

VALE, Mariana M.; BERENGUER, Erika; MENEZES, Marcio Argollo de; CASTRO, Ernesto B. Viveiros de; SIQUEIRA, Ludmila Pugliese de; PORTELA, Rita de Cássia Q. The COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil, Biological Conservation, Volume 255, 2021, 108994, ISSN 0006-3207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108994.

WESTIN, Ricardo (2020). 170 years ago, the Land Law made official Brazil’s option for large estates. Brasília: Federal Senate Agency. Available at https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/especiais/arquivo-s/ha-170-anos-lei-de-terras-desprezou-camponeses-e-oficializou-apoio-do-brasil-aos-latifundios. Accessed: 12. fev. 2021.

Downloads

Published

15-12-2022

How to Cite

Altmann, A. (2022). Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services and the Emergence of Infectious Diseases (EID): a “one health” approach on brazilian agriculture governance. Journal of Environmental Law and Society, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.18226/22370021.v12.n2.03

Issue

Section

Articles by PPGDir - UCS Researchers

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.