Questões atuais sobre corpo e linguagem: cognição corporificada, agenda empírica e enativismo linguístico

Nara Miranda de Figueiredo; Josie Helen Siman

doi:10.18226/21784612.v26.e021007

Auteurs-es

Nara Miranda de Figueiredo Unicamp http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-7467
Josie Helen Siman Unicamp http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-1941

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18226/21784612.v26.e021007

Résumé

Abordagens corporificadas da cognição humana enfatizam o papel do corpo nos processos de compreensão e produção linguística. Diversas pesquisas empíricas apresentam evidências para essas abordagens. A abordagem enativista linguística da cognição, por sua vez, sugere que temos que aprofundar nossa concepção de corpo. Nesse contexto, apresentamos (1) evidências empíricas comuns às abordagens corporificadas; (2) duas abordagens corporificadas nas ciências cognitivas: a cognição grounded e outraabordagem baseada na teoria de sistemas dinâmicos — nosso foco está no sistema conceptual segundo essas duas perspectivas; e (3) a abordagem enativista linguística da cognição. Em seguida, a partir de esclarecimentos introdutórios sobre esses três domínios, sugerimos que as evidências empíricas sustentam uma perspectiva rasa do papel do corpo na cognição, se considerarmos a concepção enativista linguística e ressaltamos a importantância de considerarmos o alcance empírico do enativismo linguístico.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Nara Miranda de Figueiredo, Unicamp

Pesquisadora - Pós-doutorado em Filosofia - Unicamp/CNPq CNPq Processo nº 151055/2019-0
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMPCentro de Lógica e Epistemologia
Rua Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, 251 - Cidade Universitária, Campinas - SP, 13083-859

Josie Helen Siman, Unicamp

Doutoranda em Linguística - Unicamp

Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP
Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem
R. Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, 571 - Cidade Universitária, Campinas - SP, 13083-859

Références

AMSEL, Ben D.; URBACH, Thomas P.; KUTAS, Marta. Empirically grounding grounded cognition: the case of color. Neuroimage, v. 99, p. 149-157, 2014.

ANTONUCCI, Sharon M.; ALT, Mary. A lifespan perspective on semantic processing of concrete concepts: does a sensory/motor model have the potential to bridge the gap? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, v. 11, n. 4, p. 551-572, 2011.

BADDELEY, Alan; ANDERSON, Michael C.; EYSENCK, Michael C. Memória. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011.

BARROS-LOSCERTALES, Alfonso; GONZALEZ, Julio; PULVERMULLER, Friedmann; VENTURA-CAMPOS, Noelia; BUSTAMANTE, Juan C.; COSTUMERO, Victor; PARCET, Maria A.; AVILA, Cesar. Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, v. 22, n. 11, p. 2.554-2.563, 2012.

BARSALOU, Lawrence W. Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, v. 22, n. 4, p. 637-660, 1999.

BARSALOU, Lawrence.W.; WIEMER-HASTINGS, Katja. Situating Abstract Concepts. In: PECHER, Diana; ZWAAN, Rolf.A., Eds., Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 129-163.

BARSALOU, Lawrence W. Grounded cognition. In: Annu – Rev. Psychol., v. 59, p. 617-645, 2008.

BARSALOU, Lawrence W. Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, v. 2, n. 4, p. 716-724, 2010.

BARSALOU, Lawrence W. Grounding knowledge in the brain’s modal systems. In: 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 2012. p. 3.

BARSALOU, Lawrence W. On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic bulletin & review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1.122-1.142, 2016a.

BARSALOU, Lawrence. W. Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In: COELLO, Y.; FISCHER, M. H. (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition: Perceptual and emotional embodiment, Philadelphia: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, p. 11–37. 2016b.

BORGHI, Anna M.; BARCA, Laura; BINKOFSKI, Ferdinand; TUMMOLINI, Luca. Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. v. 373, n. 1.752, 2018. p. 1-7.

DAVIS, Charles P.; ALTMANN, Gerry T. M.; YEE, Eiling. Situational systematicity: a role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, p. 1-12, 2020.

DEL PRADO MARTÍN, Fermín Moscoso; HAUK, Olaf; PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann. Category specificity in the processing of color-related and form-related words: An ERP study. Neuroimage, v. 29, n. 1, p. 29-37, 2006.

DESAI, Rutvik H.; REILLY, Megan; VAN DAM, Wessel. The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 373, n. 1.752, p. 1-19, 2018.

DE JAEGHER, Hanne. Di Paolo, Cuffari, De Jaegher, Replies to Nara Figueiredo and Eros Carvalho. Youtube, 13 nov. 2019. Disponível em: https://youtu.be/VaZ6Pj_kXPU. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2020.

DI PAOLO, Ezequiel; CUFFARI, Elena; DE JAEGHER, Hanne. Linguistic bodies: the continuity between life and Language. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2018.

DI PAOLO, Ezequiel. Enaction, embodiment and the social invisible (Ezequiel Di Paolo), Youtube, 16 ago. 2013. Disponível em: https://youtu.be/ATSq9EWlhDk. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2019.

FODOR, Jerry A. The language of thought. New York : Harvard University Press; Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.

FIGUEIREDO, N. M. Book review: DI PAOLO, Ezequiel; DE JAEGHER, Hanne; CUFFARI, Elena. Linguistic dodies: the continuity between Life and Language. (MIT Press, 2018, 414 pages). Revista Manuscrito, v. 43, n. 1, p. 151-170, 2020.

GARCÍA, Adolfo M.; IBÁÑEZ, Agustín. A touch with words: dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, v. 68, p. 59-95, 2016.

GARCÍA, Adolfo M.; MOGLUILNER, Sebastian; TORQUATI, Kathya; GARCIA-MARCO, Enrique; HERRERA, Eduar; MUNOZ, Edinson; CASTILLO, Eduardo M.; KLEINESCHAY, Tara; SEDENO, Lucas; IBANEZ, Agustin. How meaning unfolds in neural time: Embodied reactivations can precede multimodal semantic effects during language processing. NeuroImage, v. 197, p. 439-449, 2019.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Metaphor wars. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

GIBBS JR, Raymond W. Metaphor as dynamical: ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 34, n. 1, p. 33-44, 2019.

GLENBERG, Arthur M. et al. Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, v. 61, n. 6, p. 905-919, 2008.

GONZÁLEZ, Julio; BARROS-LOSCERTALES, Alfonso; PULVERMULLER, Friedmann; MESEGUER, Vanessa.. Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, v. 32, n. 2, p. 906-912, 2006.

JACKSON, Joshua Conrad et al. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, v. 366, n. 6.472, p. 1.517-.522, 2019.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1980.

KELSO, J. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.

KIEFER, Markus; SIM, Eun-Jin; HERRNBERGER, Barbel; GROTHE, Jo; HOENIG, Klaus. The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience, v. 28, n. 47, p. 12.224-12.230, 2008.

KIEFER, Markus.; SIM, Eun-Jin; HELBIG, Hannah; GRAF, Markus. Tracking the Time Course of Action Priming on Object Recognition: Evidence for Fast and Slow Influences of Action on Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1864-1874, 2011.

LESHINSKAYA, Anna; CARAMAZZA, Alfonso. For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 991-1.001, 2016.

MARTIN, Alex; CHAO, Linda L. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 194-201, 2001.

MARTIN, Alex. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu – Rev. Psychol., v. 58, p. 25-45, 2007.

OCHS, Elinor; SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel A.; THOMPSON, Sandra A. Grammar and interaction. Cambridge: CUP, 1996.

PATTERSON, Karalyn; RALPH, M. A. L. The hub-and-spoke model of semantic memory. In: HICKOK, Gregory; SMALL, Steven L. (ed.). Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2015.

PECHER, Diane; ZEELENBERG, René; BARSALOU, Lawrence W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modalityspecific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 164-167, 2004.

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann. Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology, v. 160, p. 1-44, 2018.

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann; FADIGA, Luciano. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 11, n. 5, p. 351-360, 2010.

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 6, n. 7, p. 576-582, 2005.

ROSCH, Eleonor. Introduction to the Revised Edition. In: VARELA, Francisco J.; THOMPSON, Evan; ROSCH, Eleanor. The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. p. xxxv-lv.

SAPIR, Edward. The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In: D. G. Mandelbaum (ed.). Selected writings of Edward sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1927-1949. p. 545-559.

SPIVEY, Michael. The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

STOLTING, Cornelia. Memória. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011.

TULVING, Endel et al. Episodic and semantic memory. Organization of Memory, v. 1, p. 381-403, 1972.

VAN ORDEN, Guy C.; HOLDEN, John G.; TURVEY, Michael T. Selforganization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 132, n. 3, p. 331-350, 2003.

VARELA, Francisco J.; THOMPSON, Evan; ROSCH, Eleanor. The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.