DIAGNÓSTICO DEL CAPITAL INSTRUMENTAL DE AREQUIPA COMO CIUDAD EMERGENTE DEL CONOCIMIENTO, 2008 – 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v9n3.09Palavras-chave:
Sistema de capitales, Capital instrumental tangible, Capital instrumental intangible, Ciudad emergente del conocimiento, ArquipaResumo
El objetivo del artículo es brindar el diagnóstico del Capital Instrumental de Arequipa afianzado en el perfil cuantitativo y cualitativo de la ciudad; el estudio basa su análisis en las dimensiones de capital instrumental tangible e intangible de la ciudad de Arequipa; galardonada como ciudad emergente del conocimiento. El aporte se evidencia de dos formas: divide el capital instrumental en dimensiones interdependientes que se adaptan al contexto peruano (tanto en el ámbito tangible como en el ámbito intangible) y brinda una escala de clasificación a las dimensiones del capital instrumental, logrando así un diagnóstico de la capacidad tangible e intangible de la ciudad. Para ello, se utilizó la metodología del Sistema de Capitales, la cual asegura la calidad e innovación de los procesos en la Administración del Conocimiento (AC). Los resultados muestran la necesidad de potenciar ciertas dimensiones como: liderazgo empresarial e investigación y desarrollo, en el aspecto intangible para brindar un valor agregado a todas las actividades que en ella se desempeñan. Asimismo, en el aspecto tangible, es necesario implementar mejoras en la conectividad e informatización de la ciudad, el sector agrícola y los espacios de intercambio cultural y de negocios.
Métricas
Referências
Ahmadian, F., Homayounifar, M., Mahdavi, M. H., Fallahi, M. A., Hosseini, S. M. (2018). Acumulación de capital tangible y no tangible en Irán: énfasis en las rentas de los recursos. QJER. 18 (1), 75-105. http://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-21256-en.html
Braithwaite, J. (2013). Flipping markets to virtue with qui tam and restorative justice.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6/7), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.002
Carrillo, F. J. (2002). Capital Systems: Implications for a Global Knowledge Agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(4), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210440884
Carrillo, F. J. (2004). Capital cities: a taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/1367327041058738
Carrillo, F. J. (2006). Knowledge Cities: Approaches, Experiences and Perspectives.
Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier).
Carrillo, F. (2014). Capital cities: a taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/1367327041058738
Castellano, N., & Díaz, B. (2020). Tecnologías de información y comunicación en la sociedad del conocimiento. Revista Científica Electrónica de negocios, 47(16), 5-12.
Delgado, J. (2020). Análisis del desarrollo y consolidación de la sostenibilidad en un territorio intervenido por proyectos mineros. Repositorio de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77361
Dirección General de Regulación de Comunicaciones. (2018). Políticas públicas y acceso a las tecnologías de información y comunicación. Lima: Ministerio de Transportes y Comunicaciones.
Fachinelli, A. C., Carrillo, F. J., y D'Arisbo, A. (2013). Capital System for Creative Economy and Social Innovation: A Brazilian case. The 6th Knowledge Cities World Summit, (págs. 472-484). Istanbul.
Silva, M. B. C. D., Bebber, S., Fachinelli, A. C., Moschen, S. D. A., & Perini, R. D. L. (2019). City life satisfaction: a measurement for smart and sustainable cities from the citizens' perspective. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 10(4), 338-383.
Flores, C. (11 de julio de 2019). Harán estudio de preinversión para mejorar aeropuerto de Arequipa. Diario Correo. https://diariocorreo.pe/economia/haran-estudio-de- preinversion-para-mejorar-aeropuerto-de-arequipa-898098/
García, B. (2004). Developing futures: a knowledge-based capital for Manchester. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410558774
Ghosh, D., & Dinda, S. (2018). Health infrastructure and economic development in India.
Management Association, I. (Ed.). Health Economics and Healthcare Reform: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, (págs. 78-97). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3168-5.ch005
Gómez, N., & Reynoso, B. (2020). Sociedad del Conocimiento vs. Educación en México.
Revista EDUCINADE, 3(6), 21-27.
https://www.cinade.edu.mx/img/revista/Revista_Educinade_No.6.pdf#page=22
Huerta, J. L. (2018). Programa Subsectorial de Irrigaciones (PSI). Arequipa: Ministerio de Agricultura y Riego.
Hwang, S., & Shin, J. (2016). ICT-specific technological change and economic growth in Korea. Telecommunications Policy, 41(4), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.006
Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2008). Diagnóstico de Monterrey como Ciudad de Conocimiento desde la perspectiva de Sistema de Capitales. Centro de Sistemas de Conocimiento, 1-55.
Li, Q., y Wu, Y. (2018). Intangible capital in Chinese regional economies: Measurement and analysis. China Economic Review, 51, 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.07.002
Méndez, R., y Sánchez, S. (2011). Spanish cities in the knowledge economy: Theoretical debates and empirical evidence. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(2), 136- 155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776410381039
Ndiaye, N., Razak, L. A., Nagayev, R., y Ng, A. (2018). Demystifying Small and Medium Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance in Emerging and Developing Economies. Borsa istanbul Review, 18(4), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.04.003
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
Sharma, R. N. (2008). Beyond the digital divide: a conceptual framework for analyzing knowledge societies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(5), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810903000
Skorobogatova, O., y Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Transport infrastructure development performance. Procedia Engineering, 178, 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.056
Tian, J., Nakamori, Y., y Wierzbicki, A. P. (2009). Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: a study based on surveys in a Japanese research university.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910942718
Usherwood, B., Wilson, K., y Bryson, J. (2005). Relevant repositories of public knowledge? Libraries, museums and archives in ‘the information age’. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000605055357
World Bank. (1999). World Development Report 1999/2000: Entering the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5982
Wu, J., Zhuo, S., y Wu, Z. (2016). National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.014
Zhang, X., y Fan, S. (2004). How productive is infrastructure? A new approach and evidence from Rural India. American Agricultural Economics Association, 86(2), 492-501. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30139571
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
