Liderança altruísta e desempenho no trabalho: uma perspectiva evolutiva Darwiniana

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18226/25253824.v6.n11.04

Palavras-chave:

Liderança altruísta, Biologia Evolucionária, Modelagem de caminhos, Genética de Populações, Liderança egoísta

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta uma teoria de liderança altruísta baseada em conceitos evolutivos. A teoria propõe que os processos naturais selecionam comportamentos egoístas e que esses comportamentos egoístas continuam na humanidade moderna. No entanto, enquanto essas tendências egoístas forneceram traços positivos de sobrevivência entre as populações ancestrais, elas induzem traços comportamentais negativos nos tempos modernos na maioria das situações organizacionais. Argumentamos que o comportamento altruísta – colocar as necessidades dos seguidores antes das próprias – provoca aumentos no desempenho do seguidor, aumentando seu comprometimento e satisfação no trabalho. No entanto, parece que as mesmas forças que levaram à disseminação de traços de liderança egoístas entre os humanos ancestrais também inibem a disseminação de traços de liderança altruísta hoje. Como tal, podemos esperar que poucos líderes naturalmente altruístas estejam disponíveis, e também podemos esperar que as organizações devam nutrir tais comportamentos para desenvolver líderes altruístas treinados. Esses líderes altruístas treinados podem ter vantagens se puderem recorrer ao treinamento para se comportar de forma altruísta com os seguidores e de forma egoísta para lidar com a competição externa. Desenvolvemos essas ideias apresentando mecanismos de como os traços de liderança egoístas se desenvolveram e se espalharam pelos humanos ancestrais, qual o papel do altruísmo na melhoria dos resultados dos seguidores e sugestões para o desenvolvimento teórico futuro.

Biografia do Autor

Ned Kock, Texas A&M International University

Ned Kock is Texas A&M Regents Professor and Chair of the Division of International Business and Technology Studies, in the Sanchez School of Business, at Texas A&M International University. He holds degrees in electronics engineering (B.E.E.), computer science (M.S.), and management (Ph.D.). Ned has authored and edited several books, including the Sage Publications book titled Systems Analysis and Design Fundamentals: A Business Process Redesign Approach. He has published his research in a number of high-impact journals including Communications of the ACM, Decision Support Systems, European Journal of Information Systems, European Journal of Operational Research, IEEE Transactions (various), Information & Management, Information Systems Journal, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, and Organization Science. He is the developer of media naturalness theory, a communications theory building on evolutionary biology that has been extensively cited by researchers in a variety of fields. He is also the developer of WarpPLS, a widely used structural equation modeling software.

Milton Mayfield, Texas A&M International University

Milton Mayfield is Emeritus Professor of Management in the A. R. Sanchez Jr. School of Business at Texas A&M International University. He has authored the book Motivating Language Theory: Effective Leader Talk in the Workplace. Milton has also published over 50 journal articles, conference proceedings, and encyclopedia chapters. These manuscripts have been published in such outlets as the Creativity Research Journal, Human Resource Management, International Journal of Business Communication, The Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed.), and Development and Learning in Organizations. He specializes in the areas of leadership communication, international management research, and creativity and innovation, and has done consulting and training work with such organizations as the US State Department, Sony Mexico, Texas Department of Transportation, Virginia Tech University, and the Callahan Ranch. He is Co-Editor of the International Journal of Business Communication.

Jacqueline Mayfield, Texas A&M International University

Jacqueline Mayfield is Emeritus Professor of Management in the A. R. Sanchez Jr. School of Business at Texas A&M International University. She has authored the book Motivating Language Theory: Effective Leader Talk in the Workplace. Jacqueline has also published over 50 journal articles and conference proceedings. These manuscripts have been published in such outlets as the International Journal of Business Communication, Creativity Research Journal, Human Resource Management, and Development and Learning in Organizations. She specializes in the areas of leadership communication, international management research, and human resource management, and has done consulting and training work with such organizations as the US State Department, Sony Mexico, Texas Department of Transportation, Virginia Tech University, and the Callahan Ranch. She is Co-Editor of the International Journal of Business Communication.

Referências

Allio, R. J. (2018). Becoming a leader–first, take charge of your own learning process. Strategy & Leadership, 46(3), 21-28.

Atkins, P. W., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Understanding individual compassion in organizations: The role of appraisals and psychological flexibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 524-546.

Boaz, N. T., & Almquist, A. J. (1997). Biological anthropology: A synthetic approach to human evolution. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brands, R. A., Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, M. (2015). The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organization Science, 26(4), 1210-1225.

Burt, A. & Trivers, R. (2006). Genes in conflict: The biology of selfish genetic elements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Hove, England: Psychology Press.

Cai, G., & Kock, N. (2009). An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 821-833.

Cartwright, J. (2008). Evolution and human behavior: Darwinian perspectives on human nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2001). Genes, peoples, and languages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., & Ashford, S. J. (2015). Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: A network perspective. Organization Science, 26(4), 1192-1209.

Dietz, M. G. (1986). Trapping the Prince: Machiavelli and the politics of deception. American Political Science Review, 80(3), 777-799.

Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 177-193.

Dixon, S. (1985). The marriage alliance in the Roman elite. Journal of Family History, 10(4), 353-378.

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety. Psychiatric Clinics, 24(4), 723-751.

Gillespie, J.H. (2004). Population genetics. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hartl, D. L., & Clark, A. G. (2007). Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Hayano, D. M. (1974). Marriage, alliance, and warfare: A view from the New Guinea Highlands. American Ethnologist, 1(2), 281-293.

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240-252.

Kock, N. (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15(3), 327-348.

Kock, N. (2009). Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: An interdisciplinary review and theory integration framework. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 395-418.

Kock, N. (2011). A mathematical analysis of the evolution of human mate choice traits: Implications for evolutionary psychologists. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(3), 219-247.

Kock, N. (2015). Wheat flour versus rice consumption and vascular diseases: Evidence from the China Study II data. Cliodynamics, 6(2), 130–146.

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.

Lawrence, P. R., & Pirson, M. (2015). Economistic and humanistic narratives of leadership in the age of globality: Toward a renewed Darwinian theory of leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 383-394.

Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross‐national comparison. Journal of Management Development, 23(4), 321–338.

Marinova, S. V., Moon, H., & Kamdar, D. (2013). Getting ahead or getting along? The two-facet conceptualization of conscientiousness and leadership emergence. Organization Science, 24(4), 1257-1276.

Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace. New York, NY: Springer.

Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Kopf, J. (1995). Motivating language: Exploring theory with scale development. Journal of Business Communication, 32(4), 329-344.

Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Kopf, J. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3‐4), 235-248.

Maynard Smith, J. (1998). Evolutionary genetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

McElreath, R., & Boyd, R. (2007). Mathematical models of social evolution: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.

Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Milton, K. (1999). A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 8(1), 11-21.

Nicholson, N. (2005). Objections to evolutionary psychology: Reflections, implications and the leadership exemplar. Human Relations, 58(3), 393-409.

Pauchant, T. C. (2005). Integral leadership: A research proposal. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(3), 211-229.

Pierce, B. D., & White, R. (1999). The evolution of social structure: Why biology matters. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 843-853.

Rice, S. H. (2004). Evolutionary theory: Mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Richards, M. P., Schulting, R. J., & Hedges, R. E. (2003). Archaeology: Sharp shift in diet at onset of Neolithic. Nature, 425(6956), 366-366.

Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257–266.

Rippin, A. (2007). Stitching up the leader: empirically based reflections on leadership and gender. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(2), 209-226.

Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2013). Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York, NY: Springer.

Schneier, F. R. (2003). Social anxiety disorder: Is common, underdiagnosed, impairing, and treatable. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 515.

Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.

Slantchev, B. L. (2004). How initiators end their wars: The duration of warfare and the terms of peace. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 813-829.

Spisak, B. R., O'Brien, M. J., Nicholson, N., & van Vugt, M. (2015). Niche construction and the evolution of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 291-306.

Sposato, M. (2019). Understanding paternalistic leadership: A guide for managers considering foreign assignments. Strategy & Leadership, 47(5), 47-52.

Stanford, C. B. (1999). The hunting apes: Meat eating and the origins of human behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Taneyhill, D. E., Dunn, A. M., & Hatcher, M. J. (1999). The Galton–Watson branching process as a quantitative tool in parasitology. Parasitology Today, 15(4), 159-165.

Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self‐deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907(1), 114-131.

Trivers, R. (2002). Natural selection and social theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, E.O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5(3), 161-215.

Wright, S. (1960). Path coefficients and path regressions: Alternative or complementary concepts? Biometrics, 16(2), 189-202.

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205-214.

Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The Handicap Principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Publicado

05-05-2022

Como Citar

Kock, N., Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2022). Liderança altruísta e desempenho no trabalho: uma perspectiva evolutiva Darwiniana. Revista Interdisciplinar De Ciência Aplicada, 6(11), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.18226/25253824.v6.n11.04

Edição

v. 6 n. 11 (2022): Revista Interdisciplinar de Ciência Aplicada

Seção

Artigos Completos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2022 Ned Kock, Milton Mayfield, Jacqueline Mayfield

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.