O USO DE PRÁTICAS ÁGEIS EM PROJETOS DE INOVAÇÃO: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v9n3.06Palavras-chave:
Práticas ágeis, Projetos de inovação, Revisão sistemática da literatura, Desenvolvimento de software, Abordagem híbridaResumo
A preferência por práticas ágeis para gerenciar projetos vem do campo de desenvolvimento de software. Com base nas semelhanças entre software e projetos de inovação, este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar a abordagem da literatura sobre a aplicação das práticas ágeis na gestão de projetos de inovação. Foi adotada uma revisão sistemática da literatura para atingir esse objetivo. Os resultados foram agrupados em três tópicos de acordo com a relação entre prática ágil e inovação: (1) práticas ágeis adotadas em projetos focados em inovação; (2) inovação como resultado de práticas ágeis adotadas para gerir os projetos; e (3) combinações inovadoras de práticas ágeis para gestão de projetos. Não mais do que 17% dos artigos analisados mostram a aplicação de práticas ágeis em projetos de inovação não associados ao desenvolvimento de software. A principal contribuição deste estudo é a evidência de que a aplicação de práticas ágeis em projetos não exclusivamente relacionados ao desenvolvimento de software proporciona os mesmos benefícios obtidos em projetos de software, exigindo, no entanto, que alguns ajustes sejam feitos. Tais ajustes são maiores à medida que a entrega do projeto se afasta do conceito digital indo na direção de produtos físicos, como hardware ou manufatura. O engajamento e autonomia da equipe são componentes essenciais no processo de adaptação às necessidades do projeto. Além disso, recomenda-se, segundo a literatura, aguardar um período de maturação antes de realizar medições de eficiência e eficácia desse tipo de abordagem de gestão. As contribuições incluem uma melhor compreensão das diferentes relações entre inovação e aplicação de práticas ágeis.
Métricas
Referências
Abrahamsson, P.; Hanhineva, A.; Hulkko, H.; Ihme, T.; Jäälinoja, J.; Korkala, M.; & Salo, O. (2004). Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development. In Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (pp. 174-175).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1028664.1028736
Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08439. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08439
Ahmad-Khan, Z. (2014). Scrumban-adaptive agile development process. Helsinki: Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/77014/Khan_Zahoor.pdf?sequence=1
Aldave, A.; Vara, J. M.; Granada, D.; & Marcos, E. (2019). Leveraging creativity in requirements elicitation within agile software development: a systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, 110396.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.110396
Apilo, T.; Taskinen, T.; & Salkari, I. (2007). Johda innovaatioita. Alma Talent. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Augustine, S.; Payne, B.; Sencindiver, F.; & Woodcock, S. (2005). Agile project management: Steering from the edges. Comm. ACM 48(12) 85–89.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1101779.1101781
Beck, K. (2000). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley professional
Brown, S. L.; & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
Cao, L., Mohan, K., Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2004, January). How extreme does extreme programming have to be? Adapting XP practices to large-scale projects. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265237
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G.; Soto-Acosta, P.; & Wensley, A. K. (2016). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1544-1549.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014
Cho, J. & Lee, J. (2013). Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40: 5314–5330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038
Coad, P.; LeFebvre, E.; & De Luca, J. (2000). Java Modeling In Color With UML: Enterprise Components and Process, Prentice Hall.
Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development, the people factor. Computer, 34(11), 131-133.
Coenen, T.; & Robijt, S. (2016). Heading for a FALL: A Framework for Agile Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1):37–43. Retrieved from http://timreview.ca/article/1048
Conboy, K. (2009). Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information systems research, 20(3), 329-354.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0236
Concas, G.; Marchesi, M.; Destefanis, G.; & Tonelli, R. (2012). An empirical study of software metrics for assessing the phases of an agile project. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 22(04), 525-548.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194012500131
Conforto, E.C.; & Amaral, D.C. (2010). Evaluating an agile method for planning and controlling innovative projects. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 73-80.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20089
Cooper, R. (1987), Winning at New Products, Kogan Page, London.
Cooper, R.G. (1983). A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 2-11.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1983.6448637
Cooper, R.G.; & Sommer, A. F. (2016). The agile–stage‐gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(5), 513-526.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12314
Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 36-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005
Cordero, R. (1991). Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 283-294.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(91)90049-5
Denning, S. (2016). How Useful Is Christensen's Theory of Disruptive Innovation? Forbes Retrieved, 30.
Digital.AI.TEAM (2020). 14ª Pesquisa Anual sobre o Estado Agile™. Retrieved from https://stateofagile.com/#ufh-i-615706098-14th-annual-state-of-agile-report/7027494 acessada em 14/06/2020.
Dikert, K.; Paasivaara, M.; & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
Dönmez, D.; & Grote, G. (2018). Two sides of the same coin–how agile software development teams approach uncertainty as threats and opportunities. Information and Software Technology, 93, 94-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.08.015
Eklund, U., & Bosch, J. (2012). Applying agile development in mass-produced embedded systems. In International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 31-46). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
https://10.1007/978- 3- 642- 30350- 0_3.
Gamboa, J. C. (2014). Aumento de la productividad en la gestión de proyectos, utilizando una metodología ágil aplicada en una fábrica de software en la ciudad de Guayaquil. Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL, 27(2). Retrieved from
http://www.rte.espol.edu.ec/index.php/tecnologica/article/view/312
Gonzalez, W. (2014). Applying agile project management to predevelopment stages of innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(04), 1450020.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014500205
Gothelf, J.; & Seiden, J. (2013). Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
Green, D. (2016). Scrum. Novice to ninja. EUA: SitePoint Pty Ltd. ISBN: 978 0 994346919.
Gurd, B.; & Ifandoudas, P. (2014). Moving towards agility: the contribution of a modified balanced scorecard system. Measuring Business Excellence.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-10-2012-0052
Hage, J. T. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 597-622.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.597
Hall, P.H.; & Hall, P. (1994). Innovation, economics and evolution: theoretical perspectives on changing technology in economic systems. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hannola, L.; Friman, J.; and Niemimuukko, J. (2013). Application of agile methods in the innovation process. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 7, 1:84–98.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2013.050557
Harkema, S. (2003). A complex adaptive perspective on learning within innovation projects. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 10(6), 340-346.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470310497177
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier.
Highsmith, J. (2004). The agile revolution. J. Highsmith, Agile Project Management.
Iivari, J.; & Iivari, N. (2011). The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods. Information and software technology, 53(5), 509-520.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.008
Kane, D. W., Hohman, M. M., Cerami, E. G., McCormick, M. W., Kuhlmman, K. F., & Byrd, J. A. (2006). Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report. BMC bioinformatics, 7(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273
Kettunen, P. (2009). Adopting key lessons from agile manufacturing to agile software product Development: A comparative study. Technovation, 29, 6/7: 408–422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.003
Kiron, D., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., & Kruschwitz, N. (2012). Social business: what are companies really doing? MIT Sloan management review, 53(4), 1.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
Koen, P.; Ajamian, G.; Burkart, R.; Clamen, A.; Davidson, J.; D'Amore, R.; & Karol, R. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Research-Technology Management, 44(2), 46-55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418
Könnölä, K., Suomi, S., Mäkilä, T., Rantala, V., & Lehtonen, T. (2017). Can embedded space system development benefit from agile practices?. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2017(1), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13639-016-0040-z
Könnölä, K.; Suomi, S.; Mäkilä, T.; Jokela, T,; Rantala, V.; & Lehtonen, T. (2016). Agile methods in embedded system development: Multiple-case study of three industrial cases. Journal of Systems and Software. 118, 134–150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.001
Laanti, M.; Salo, O.; & Abrahamsson, P. (2011). Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: A survey of opinions on agile transformation. Information and Software Technology, 53(3), 276-290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.010
Ladas, C. (2009). Scrumban - Essays on kanban systems for lean software development. EUA: Modus Cooperandi Press.
Lindberg, T., Meinel, C., & Wagner, R. (2011). Design thinking: A fruitful concept for it development?. In Design thinking (pp. 3-18). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
https ://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757 -0_1
Meyer, M.H.; & Marion, T.J. (2010). Innovating for effectiveness: Lessons from design firms. Research-Technology Management, 53(5), 21-28.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657647
Moe, N.B.; & Dingsøyr, T. (2017). Emerging research themes and updated research agenda for large-scale agile development: a summary of the 5th international workshop at XP2017. In Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops (pp. 1-4).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3120459.3120474
Ordysinski, T. (2013). “Kanban based information management in organizations”. In: Polish Association for Knowledge Management, pp. 76-85. Retrieved from http://pszw.edu.pl/en/publications/item/1051-tomt063-4
Palmer, S.R.; & Felsing, J.M. (2002). A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Pavitt, K. (1990). What we know about the strategic management of technology. California management review, 32(3), 17-26.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41166614
Pollock, A.; & Berge, E. (2018). How to do a systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 13(2), 138-156.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743796
Poppendieck, M.; & Poppendieck, T. (2003) Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River.
Rahman, M.S.; Rivera, E.; Khomh, F.; Guéhéneuc, Y.G.; & Lehnert, B. (2019). Machine learning software engineering in practice: An industrial case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07154.
Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 22-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.002
Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business.
Salmelin, B. (2020). Open Innovation 2.0 supporting structural knowledge. In Intellectual Capital in the Digital Economy (pp. 7-18). Routledge.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1997). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural.
Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with Scrum. Microsoft press.
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with Scrum (Vol. 1). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Schwaber, K.; Sutherland, J. (2017). The Scrum guide. Retrieved from https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Silva, D. S., Ghezzi, A., Aguiar, R. B., Cortimiglia, M. N., & ten Caten, C. S. (2020). Lean Startup, Agile Methodologies and Customer Development for business model innovation: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2019-0425
Sohaib, O., Solanki, H., Dhaliwa, N., Hussain, W., & Asif, M. (2019). Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(6), 2485-2492.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0932-y
Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The new new product development game. Harvard business review, 64(1), 137-146.
Tura, N.; Hannola, L.; & Pynnönen, M. (2017). Agile methods for boosting the commercialization process of new technology. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(03), 1750013.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500134
Valero-Pastor, J.M.; Carvajal-Prieto, M.; & García-Avilés, J.A. (2019). Flujos de trabajo para el periodismo postindustrial: métodos y programas para una comunicación organizacional más ágil y transversal. El profesional de la información, 28(5).
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.14
Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management science, 32(7), 791-805.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Luis Zanfelicce, Maria Helena Costa Resnitzky, Augusto Cezar Romerio de Andrade, Renato Penha, Luciano Ferreiro da Silva
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
