VALUE INNOVATION USING AN IDEA PLATFORM AT A BRAZILIAN UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v9n1.07Keywords:
Value innovation, Public sector, Crowdsourcing, Ideas platformAbstract
In recent years, public institutions in several countries have used open innovation, especially challenges of ideas, aiming at greater collaboration of citizens in public management. However, there is a lack of deepening about the values added by these initiatives to organizations and citizens. In this research, we seek to deepen investigations in this context, using the “Value Innovation Radar”: a theoretical model, proposed by Martins et al. (2019), composed of four dimensions and twelve critical factors to assess the perception of innovation in public sector projects. The main objective is to apply the "Radar” model to identify the perception of value innovation by users of an idea management platform. It is an applied research, with exploratory-descriptive objectives, quantitative and qualitative approaches, and the unit of analysis is the “Uni Challenge+”. The results include the analysis and the exploratory-statistical discussion about the “Radar” factors. We conclude that the Collaboration factor does not meet the statistical suitability to evaluate the “Uni+ Project”. In addition, the academic community perceived the project as innovative in terms of openness and efficiency in capturing ideas, however, it did not realize, or did not receive the total necessary information about the effectiveness of the challenge, mainly associated with the implementation of the winning ideas in the process.
Metrics
References
Abdullah, A. (2014). A conceptual model to establish an Islamic Finance Unit at a Malaysian public university. Asian Social Science, 10(9), 100-107.
Aberbach, J. D., & Christensen, T. (2005). Citizens and consumers: An NPM dilemma. Public management review, 7(2), 225-246.
Abrahamson, S., Ryder, P., & Unterberg, B. (2013). Crowdstorm: the future of innovation, ideas, and problem solving: John Wiley & Sons.
Abrucio, F. L. (2007). Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de reformas. Revista de Administração Pública, 41(SPE), 67-86.
Aguiar, C. (2015a, 3 set. 2020). Desafio UFLA+ soluções inovadoras tem noite de premiações. Diretoria de Comunicação da UFLA. Retrieved 20 mai 2020
Aguiar, C. (2015b, 7 ago 2020). Finalizada primeira rodada do desafio UFLA + com 4,5 mil ideias para a universidade. Diretoria de Comunicação da UFLA.
Ahmat, M. A., Jaafar, C. R. C., & Azmi, N. A. (2016). The Transformation of Reference Services in Hamzah Sendut Library, Universiti Sains Malaysia. In B. H. Voon, J. Hamali, F. Abdullah, C. Joseph, S. H. Leong, U. H. Lau, E. S. M. Chung, K. C. Ng & A. K. Teo (Eds.), Irssm-6: The 6th International Research Symposium in Service Management - Service Imperatives in the New Economy: Service Excellence for Sustainability (Vol. 224, pp. 6-13). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv.
Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government information quarterly, 30(3), 277-288.
Antonialli, F., Antonialli, L. M., & Antonialli, R. (2016). Usos e abusos da escala Likert: estudo bibliométrico nos anais do ENANPAD de 2010 a 2015. Paper presented at the Congresso de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação.
Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2009). Inovação e empreendedorismo: Bookman Editora.
Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public administration review, 475-487.
Camargo, F. d. O., & Guimarães, K. M. (2013). O princípio da eficiência na gestão pública. Revista CEPPG-CESUC-Centro de Ensino Superior de Catalão, Ano XVI nº, 28.
Chern, J. S., Huang, A., & Wu, L. (2008). Incubating domestic space-qualified manufacturers through ROCSAT programs. Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium of the International Academy of Astronautics: Small Satellites for Earth Observation, IAA 2007, Berlin.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Christodoulou, I., & Langley, P. A. (2019). A gaming simulation approach to understanding blue ocean strategy development as a transition from traditional competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1-26.
Cordelia, A. (2007). E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of information technology, 22(3), 265-274.
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512-520.
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279-286.
de Souza, W. V. B., Cavalcante, C. C. M., Pereira, W. R., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Martins, T. C. M., & Pereira, J. R. (2014). Planning the use of crowdstorming for public management: a case in the Ministry of Education of Brazil.
Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-De-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, 38(2), 189-200.
Gonçalves, A. (2005). O conceito de governança. XIV Encontro do Conpedi, 16.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate statistics. Upper Saddle River.
Hakola, J. (2016). Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations.
Hasan, F. A., Komoo, I., Nor, M. N. M., & Abdullah, Z. (2017). Transformation of universities and the national Blue Ocean Strategy: A case study of Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 12(1), 70-78.
Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1).
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6), 1-4.
Howell, M. T. (2009). Critical success factors simplified: Implementing the powerful drivers of dramatic business improvement: CRC Press.
Karunasena, K., & Deng, H. (2010). Exploring the Public Value of e-Government: An Empirical Study from Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the Bled eConference.
Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value. London, Cabinet Office.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Value innovation: a leap into the blue ocean.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2014). Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant: Harvard business review Press.
Kim, W. C., & Maubourge, R. (1997). Value innovation. Havard Business Review(1).
Klein, A. D., & Santos, E. R. (2019). A utilização das tecnologias da informação no âmbito da previdência social: a inclusão excludente da internet aos segurados previdenciários/The use of information technologies in the framework of social security: the excluding inclusion of the internet to the private insured. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(2), 1692-1701.
Lee, Y. L., Wang, W. S., & Chung, S. M. (2017). The Blue Ocean Strategy applied in a flood control product development. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation, ICASI 2017.
Liu, H. K. (2017). Exploring Online Engagement in Public Policy Consultation: The Crowd or the Few? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 33-47.
Martins, T. C. M., & Bermejo, P. H. d. S. (2016). Desafio de ideias para o governo aberto: o caso da Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais – Brasil. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 21(70).
Martins, T. C. M., & Zambalde, A. L. (2020). A Sabedoria das Multidões e a Esfera Pública: a co-produção de soluções para problemas públicos em plataformas de gestão de ideias. Administração Pública e Gestão Social.
Martins, T. C. M., Zambalde, A. L., Grützmann, A., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., de Almeida, E. L., & do Nascimento, T. B. P. (2019). Value Innovation in the Public Sector: Concept, Determining Factors and Framework. Lecture NOtes in Computer Science, 11709, 163-175.
Mergel, I. (2015). Opening Government: Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate With External Problem Solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 599-612.
Wernerfelt, B., A resource-based view of the firm Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171-180; Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government: Harvard university press.
Murugesan, R., & Sudarsanam, S. K. (2019). Transdisciplinary approach for sustainable rural development. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1), 2454-2460.
Oliveira, L. F. d. (2015). Consequências da adoção de inovações: um modelo de análise além do viés pró-inovação.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2019). Plataforma: a revolução da estratégia: Alta Books.
Parra Duarte, C., Bizelli, J., Corrêa, V., & Vargas, T. (2016). Governo e participação digital: limites e possibilidades do Programa Dialoga Brasil.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Teresa Cristina Monteiro Martins, André Luiz Zambalde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
