UMA INVESTIGAÇÃO DA TEORIA INSTITUCIONAL: ANÁLISE DAS PRINCIPAIS TENDÊNCIAS EM INOVAÇÃO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v9n2.06Palavras-chave:
Organização, Legitimidade, Teoria da InovaçãoResumo
O presente estudo tem como objetivo realizar uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre a Teoria Institucional e a inovação com foco de investigar as respectivas tendências e influências entre as teorias. A inovação é o uso de um novo conhecimento para a concepção de novos produtos, serviços ou processos, especialmente com caráter inédito, com o objetivo de atender as demandas atuais e futuras de indústrias, organizações e indivíduos. A globalização incentivada pelas inovações por meio do desenvolvimento e difusão, aumentou principalmente nas últimas duas décadas. A metodologia utilizada foi uma revisão sistemática de literatura, foram identificados os principais artigos, sem um recorte temporal delimitado. As bases de dados adotadas foram: Scopus, Web of Science e ScienceDirect. Para tanto, foram aplicados filtros ao portfólio total de artigos entre as bases de dados selecionadas. Inicialmente foram identificados 106 artigos e 22 artigos foram selecionados para identificar as tendências e as relações entre a Teoria Institucional e a inovação. Os resultados mostram as principais tendências na literatura entre 2010 até 2020, as possíveis ligações da teoria institucional e a inovação, bem como os continentes que realizaram estudos. Ainda, podem ser vistos os principais países que abrigam publicações com fator de impacto sobre os temas abordados e suas localizações. Além disso, este estudo mostra os periódicos mais citados e apresenta uma visão geral da Teoria Institucional e Inovação. Como pesquisas futuras, os autores sugerem contribuições teóricas sobre distinções entre instituições formais e informais, reguladora, normativa e tipos cultural-cognitivos das instituições.
Métricas
Referências
Bergsgard, N. A., Nødland, S. I. (2020). Open Tenders in Public Procurement of Welfare Services: Professionalization, Standardization, and Innovation among Civil Sector Providers. Journal of Civil Society, 56(1), p.1-14.
Berger, P; Luckmann, T. (1985). A construção social da realidade. 19º Edição, Editora Vozes. Petrópolis.
Berrone, P. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, New Jersey, 34(8), p.891-909.
Branstad, A., Solem, B. A. (2020). Emerging theories of consumer-driven market innovation, adoption, and diffusion: A selective review of consumer-oriented studies. Journal of Business Research, 116(1), p.561-571.
Carvalho, A. D .P., DA Cunha, S. K., Lima, L. F., Carstens, D. D. (2016). The role and contributions of institutional theory for the theory of innovation. Espacios, 37(30),p.17-29.
Chandler, D.; Hwang, H. (2015). Learning From Learning Theory: A Model of Organizational Adoption Strategies at the Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. Journal of Management, 41(5). p.1446-1476.
Dimaggio, P. J.; Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1), p. 147-160.
Dutra, F. G.; Almeida, F. G. (2018). Elementos para estímulo da cultura de inovação: Mapeamento das diterizes adotadas por empresas de destaque brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação. 5(3), p. 96-120.
Estol, J., Camilleri, M. A., Font, X. (2018). European Union tourism policy: an institutional theory critical discourse analysis. Tourism Review. 73(3), p. 421-431.
Hatch, M. J.; Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hazarika, N.; Zhang, X. (2019). Evolving theories of eco-innovation: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18(1). p.64-74.
Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M. (2019). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 19(1), p. 31-41.
Jenssen, J. I., Nybakk, E. (2013). Inter-organization networks and innovation in small, knowledge-intensive firms: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation, 17(2), p.1-15.
Karkinbayeva, S. I., Kirdasinova, K. A., Adiyetova, E. M., Kanatova, A. Z., Korgan, B. B. (2019). Topical issues surrounding supply chain management in developing food industry: Kazakhstan case study. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 8(4), p. 743-750.
Khurshid, M. M.; Zakaria, N. Hidayati; R. A. (2020). Modeling of Open Government Data for Public Sector Organizations Using the Potential Theories and Determinants: A Systematic Review. Informatics Basel, 7(3), p. 24-32.
Koskela-Huotari, K.; Vink, J.; Edvardsson, B. (2020). The institutional turn in service research: taking stock and moving ahead. Journal of Services Marketing, 34 (3) p.373-387.
Liao, Z. J., Huang, C. (2017). Review on enterprises' eco-innovation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28 (12), p. 4150-4156.
Meyer, J. W.; Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: Powell, W. W.; Dimaggio, P. J. (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organization analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mignerat, M.; Rivard, S. (2010). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of information technology, 24(4). p. 339-369.
Mizruchi, M.; Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), p. 653-683.
Niesten, E., Jolink, A. (2020). Motivations for Environmental Alliances: Generating and Internalizing Environmental and Knowledge Value. International Journal of Management Reviews. 22(4), p. 356-377.
Pishdad, A.; Haider, A.; Koronios, A. (2012). An Institutionalisation Perspective on Technology Lifecycle-A Literature Review. International Business Information Management, 18(2), p. 78-91.
Rosevear, E., Trebilcock, M., Mota Prado, M. (2020). The New Progressivism and its implications for institutional theories of development. Development Policy Review. 10(3), p. 33-47.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Introduction: institutional theory and organizations. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds.). The institutional construction of organizations (pp. xi-xxiii). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Smith, A.; C. J.; Tuck, J.; Mceachern, S. (2012). Building the capacity to innovate: the role of human capital. NCVER, Austrália.
Szyliowicz, D.; Galvin, T. (2010). Applying broader strokes: Extending institutional perspectives and agendas for international entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 19(4), p.317-332.
Tidd, J.; Bessant, J. (2018). Innovation Management Challenges: From fads to fundamentals. University of Sussex. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), p.1-13.
Van Oorschot, J. A. W. H.; Hofman, E.; Halman, J. I. M. (2018). A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134(1), p.1-21.
Verhoeven, J. C. (2020). De Wit, K. How did Australian scholars perceive the Bologna Process? Higher Education Research and Development, 4(2), p. 27-41.
Watson, R., Wilson, H. N., Smart, P., Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing Difference: A Capability-Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), p. 254-279.
Wolsink, M. (2020). Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127(1), p. 1-22.
Zollet, R. (2014). Interactivity of Corporate Websites: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(1), p.2-16.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
