MAPA DA LITERATURA E OPORTUNIDADES DE PESQUISAS PARA O TEMA GESTÃO DE RISCOS DE ACIDENTES DE TRABALHO NA INDÚSTRIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v9n2.03Palavras-chave:
Gestão de riscos, Acidentes de trabalho, Construção civil, Mapa de literatura, Proknow-CResumo
A construção civil é uma das atividades econômicas de destaque para o desenvolvimento da humanidade. Por razões históricas, os métodos utilizados no desenvolvimento da construção não foram planejados com foco em assegurar a segurança e saúde dos trabalhadores. Este cenário resulta em um ambiente de trabalho pouco atrativo, propício a acidentes e via de consequências motiva o absenteísmo, perda de produtividade, incapacidade temporária e permanente e fatalidades. Para reverter este cenário, as organizações demandam de novas abordagens para garantir o desempenho esperado. O objetivo da pesquisa é proceder ao mapeamento da literatura internacional sobre o tema Gestão de Riscos de Acidentes de Trabalho na Indústria da Construção Civil por meio da construção do Mapa da Literatura e pela identificação de oportunidades de pesquisas futuras com base na percepção dos pesquisadores. Para tanto, utilizou-se o instrumento de intervenção Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C). O Portfólio Bibliográfico – PB foi composto por 25 artigos. Os resultados revelaram a identificação de quatro clusters como as perspectivas ou áreas estratégicas: (i) Política de Segurança do Trabalho, (ii) Comportamento Seguro, (iii) Práticas de Segurança do Trabalho e (iv) Avaliação de Desempenho. Estes temas estabeleceram a temática do PB de acordo a Lei de Zipf. Para estes temas, identificou-se 18 tópicos para operacionalizá-los, além de identificar os conhecimentos já consolidados e os conhecimentos ainda por desenvolver, ou seja, as lacunas de conhecimento ou oportunidades de pesquisa.
Métricas
Referências
Anuário Estatístico de Acidentes do Trabalho (2017). AEAT 2017 / Ministério da Fazenda ... [et al.]. – vol. 1– . – Brasília: MF, 996 p.
Castro, C. D. M. (2006). A prática da pesquisa. São Paulo: Pearson, 2. ed.
Cheng, E. W., Ryan, N., & Kelly, S. (2012). Exploring the perceived influence of safety management practices on project performance in the construction industry. Safety science, 50(2), 363-369.
Chi, S., & Han, S. (2013). Analyses of systems theory for construction accident prevention with specific reference to OSHA accident reports. International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 1027-1041.
Choe, S., & Leite, F. (2020). Transforming inherent safety risk in the construction industry: A safety risk generation and control model. Safety science, 124, 104594.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Brasil. (2020). Ministério da Público do Trabalho. Observatório de Segurança e Saúde do Trabalho Disp. em: http//smartlabbr.org/sst/localidade/0?dimensao=frequenciaAcidentes>. Acesso em: 10 de abril de 2020.
Dejours, C. (1986). Por um novo conceito de saúde. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 54, p. 7-11.
Dejours, C. (1996). Uma nova visão do sofrimento humano nas organizações: o indivíduo na organização: dimensões esquecidas. 2a ed. São Paulo: Atlas, v. 1, p. 149-173.
Dejours, C., & Molinier, P. (2004). O trabalho como enigma. Christophe Dejours: da psicopatologia à psicodinâmica do trabalho. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 127-140.
Dutra, A., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., Fillol, A. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Pinto, H. D. M. (2013). Processo de investigação e Análise bibliométrica: Avaliação da Qualidade dos Serviços Bancários. Revista de administração contemporânea, 17(3), 325-349.
Ensslin, L., Mussi, C. C., Chaves, L. C., & Demetrio, S. N. (2015). It outsourcing management: The state of the art recognition by a constructivist research process and bibliometrics. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(2), 371-392.
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S., Dutra, A., Longaray, A., & Dezem, V. (2018). Performance assessment model for bank client's services and business development process: a constructivist proposal. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 11(1), 100-126.
Ensslin, L., Mussi, C. C., Ensslin, S. R., Dutra, A., & Fontana, L. P. B. (2020). Organizational knowledge retention management using a constructivist multi-criteria model. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2012). Occupational risk management under the OHSAS 18001 standard: analysis of perceptions and attitudes of certified firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 36-47.
Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2014). Safety leadership, risk management and safety performance in Spanish firms. Safety science, 70, 295-307.
Fleischer, G. A. (1969). Capital allocation theory: the study of investment decisions (No. HG4028. C4 F56). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Fung, I. W., Lo, T. Y., & Tung, K. C. (2012). Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: Development of a qualitative & quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48, 167-184.
Fung, I. W., Tam, V. W., Lo, T. Y., & Lu, L. L. (2010). Developing a risk assessment model for construction safety. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 593-600.
Fung, I. W., & Tam, V. W. (2013). Development of an empirical model for selecting accident prevention measures for construction managers. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(1), 39-51.
Grant, E. L., & Ireson, W. G. (1970). Principles of engineering economy.
Guo, B. H., Yiu, T. W., González, V. A., & Goh, Y. M. (2017). Using a pressure-state-practice model to develop safety-leading indicators for construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143(2), 04016092.
Hämäläinen, P., Takala, J., & Kiat, T. B. (2017). Global estimates of occupational accidents and work-related illnesses 2017. World, 2017, 3-4.
Hinze, J., Hallowell, M., & Baud, K. (2013). Construction-safety best practices and relationships to safety performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139(10), 04013006.
Hinze, J., Thurman, S., & Wehle, A. (2013). Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety science, 51(1), 23-28.
Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety science, 103, 124-136.
Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. Process safety and environmental protection, 98, 116-147.
Leveson, N. (2015). A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 136, 17-34.
Li, H., Lu, M., Hsu, S. C., Gray, M., & Huang, T. (2015). Proactive behavior-based safety management for construction safety improvement. Safety science, 75, 107-117.
Li, Y., & Guldenmund, F. W. (2018). Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature. Safety Science, 103, 94-123.
Mao, J. C. (1958). The Impact of Federal Mortgage Insurance Programs on Ann Arbor's Home Mortgage Market, 1956. Journal of Finance, 412-416.
Mao, J. C. (1970). Survey of capital budgeting: Theory and practice. Journal of finance, 349-360.
Morgado, L., Silva, F. J. G., & Fonseca, L. M. (2019). Mapping Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems in Portugal: outlook for ISO 45001: 2018 adoption. Procedia Manufacturing, 38, 755-764.
Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety science, 73, 146-166.
Reiman, T., & Pietikäinen, E. (2012). Leading indicators of system safety monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety science, 50(10), 1993-2000.
Richardson, R. J. (2017). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 4 ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Shea, J. A., & Fortna, G. S. (2002). Psychometric methods. In International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 97-126). Springer, Dordrecht.
Sousa, V., Almeida, N. M., & Dias, L. A. (2014). Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry–Part 1: Background knowledge. Safety science, 66, 75-86.
Sousa, V., Almeida, N. M., & Dias, L. A. (2015). Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry–Part 2: Quantitative model. Safety science, 74, 184-194.
Swuste, P., Theunissen, J., Schmitz, P., Reniers, G., & Blokland, P. (2016). Process safety indicators, a review of literature. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 162-173.
Thiel, G. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2017). Street lighting management and performance evaluation: opportunities and challenges. Lex Localis, 15(2), 303.
Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, L. (2016). Construção de conhecimento sobre avaliação de desempenho para gestão organizacional: uma investigação nas pesquisas científicas internacionais. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13(28), 123-148.
Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ciência da informação, 31(2), 369-379.
Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 2082-2093.
Wachter, J. K., & Yorio, P. L. (2014). A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 117-130.
Yiu, NS, Chan, DW, Shan, M., & Sze, NN (2019). Implementation of safety management system in managing construction projects: Benefits and obstacles. Safety science, 117, 23-32.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
