From Traditional Leadership to Holdership
Unraveling the Semco’s Case
Palavras-chave:
InnovationResumo
This article explores the role of holdership principles in organizational dynamics, focusing on the case of Semco, a renowned Brazilian company recognized for its innovative practices. Drawing on Winnicott’s theory of human emotional development, the study examines the application of holdership principles within Semco and their implications for employee experiences and organizational outcomes. The specific objectives are to analyze the alignment of Semco’s practices with holdership principles, explore the conceptual connections between Winnicott’s theory and holdership, and investigate the impact of holdership on individual and organizational outcomes. Through qualitative analysis, the study reveals that Semco’s emphasis on autonomy, ownership, collaboration, and shared responsibility reflects the embodiment of holdership principles. The findings indicate positive outcomes, including increased employee satisfaction, enhanced creativity and innovation, and improved organizational dynamics. However, a critical perspective reminds us to consider potential trade-offs and unintended consequences. Overall, this article aims to contribute to the understanding of holdership as a sustainable and inclusive organizational framework and provides practical implications for organizations seeking to foster a supportive and empowering work environment.
Referências
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). University of Michigan Press.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership (pp. 189-207). Southern Illinois University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change. Free Press.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 1-18). Sage.
Semler, R. (1993). Maverick. Warner Books.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership. Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. International Universities Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. Routledge.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Sage
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Anderson Sant'Anna
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade. Declaro, ainda, que uma vez publicado na Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação (Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation), o mesmo jamais será submetido por mim ou por qualquer um dos demais co-autores a qualquer outro periódico. Através deste instrumento, em meu nome e em nome dos demais co-autores, porventura existentes, cedo os direitos autorais do referido artigo Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação (Brazilian Journal of Management & Innovation), que está autorizada a publicá-lo em meio impresso, digital, ou outro existente, sem retribuição financeira para os autores. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
