Circular Economy of Packaging in Brazil
Stakeholders' Perspectives on its Institutionalization
Keywords:
circular economy, reverse logistics, waste management, institutional theory, packagingAbstract
According to Institutional Theory, it is possible to internalize values in society and make certain attitudes considered appropriate or correct. This paper aims to analyze the stages of institutionalization of the Circular Economy of packaging in Brazil. This is an applied, qualitative and descriptive study that used the triangulation between document analysis and in-depth interviews to collect data. The intention was to enable the confrontation of the perceptions of several stakeholders (cross analysis) in the packaging sector in Brazil. Fifty-three (53) stakeholders working in this chain participated in the interviews. Results point out the initial phase of institutionalization of the Circular Economy of packaging (habitualization) in Brazil. After all, even ten years after its sanction, the Brazilian Policy of Solid Waste (BPSW) presents a low level of implementation. First because the country still has problems related to disposal in dumps, low recycling rates, little socio-productive inclusion of the waste pickers and low level of integration in waste management. Additionally, several stakeholders reported conflicts (objectification) and setbacks in terms of social control, making the sedimentation phase even more distant. The study contributes to knowledge in the area by improving understanding of the innovations that are necessary to implement the Circular Economy in the country. It also offers a classification of three phases of institutionalization of an innovation. The practical contribution is associated with identifying barriers and challenges that hinder the institutionalization of packaging circularity.
According to Institutional Theory, it is possible to internalize values in society and make certain attitudes considered appropriate or correct. This paper aims to analyze the stages of institutionalization of the Circular Economy of packaging in Brazil. This is an applied, qualitative and descriptive study that used the triangulation between document analysis and in-depth interviews to collect data. The intention was to enable the confrontation of the perceptions of several stakeholders (cross analysis) in the packaging sector in Brazil. Fifty-three (53) stakeholders working in this chain participated in the interviews. Results point out the initial phase of institutionalization of the Circular Economy of packaging (habitualization) in Brazil. After all, even ten years after its sanction, the Brazilian Policy of Solid Waste (BPSW) presents a low level of implementation. First because the country still has problems related to disposal in dumps, low recycling rates, little socio-productive inclusion of the waste pickers and low level of integration in waste management. Additionally, several stakeholders reported conflicts (objectification) and setbacks in terms of social control, making the sedimentation phase even more distant. The study contributes to knowledge in the area by improving understanding of the innovations that are necessary to implement the Circular Economy in the country. It also offers a classification of three phases of institutionalization of an innovation. The practical contribution is associated with identifying barriers and challenges that hinder the institutionalization of packaging circularity.
This article participated of the Call for Papers - Promoting Planet-Centered Systemic Change through Emergent Design | Brazilian Journal of Management and Innovation (Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação)
References
ABIHPEC, Brazilian Association of Personal Hygiene, Perfumery and Cosmetics Industry (2022). Give a Hand to the Future. Available in: http://maoparaofuturo.org.br/programa/o-que-e/ Accessed in: 7th July, 2023.
ABRELPE, Brazilian Association of Public Cleaning and Special Waste Companies (2021). Panorama dos Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil 2021.
Almeida, C. M. V. B., Rodrigues, A. J. M., Agostinho, F., & Giannetti, B. F. (2017). Material selection for environmental responsibility: the case of soft drinks packaging in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.130
Arsova, S., Genovese, A., & Ketikidis, P. H. (2022). Implementing circular economy in a regional context: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133117
Bardin, L. (2011). Content Analysis. Editions 70.
Batista, L., Bourlakis, M., Smart, P., & Maull, R. (2018). In search of a circular supply chain archetype–a content-analysis-based literature review. Production Planning and Control, 29(6), 438–451. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502
Batista, L., Gong, Y., Pereira, S., Jia, F., & Bittar, A. (2019). Circular supply chains in emerging economies: a comparative study of packaging recovery ecosystems in China and Brazil. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7248-7268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1558295
Brazil, 2010. Law No. 12.305 of August 2, 2010 establishing the National Solid Waste Policy.
Cerqueira-Streit, J.A, Endo, G. Y., Guarnieri, P., & Batista, L. (2021). Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Route for a Circular Economy : An Integrative Literature Review. Logistics, 5(81), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040081
Cerqueira-Streit, J. A., Guarnieri, P., Endo, G. Y., Colares-Santos, L. (2023). Loop, virtualization and exchange: operations management practices in the Brazilian packaging chain. Future Studies Research Journal, 15(1), 01-24. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2023.v15i1.740
Colijn, I., Fraiture, F., Gommeh, E., Schroën, K., & Metze, T. (2022). Science and media framing of the future of plastics in relation to transitioning to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133472
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.5465/256722
Demajorovic, J., Santos, J. B., & Oliveira, L. S. (2019). Reverse Logistics in Retail: Barriers and Motivation To Products and Packaging Return. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 12(5), 911–930. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0403-0090
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Ezeudu, O.B., Ezeudu, T.S. (2019). Implementation of circular economy principles in industrial solid waste management: Case studies from a developing economy (Nigeria). Recycling. 4(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling4040042
EMF, Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen Macarthur Foundation, 1(1), 1–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321
Ferronato, N., Rada, E. C., Gorritty Portillo, M., Cioca, L. I., Ragazzi, M., & Torretta, V. (2019). Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization. Journal of Environmental Management, 230(1), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.095
Fischer, A., & Pascucci, S. (2017). Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 17–32.
Guarnieri, P., & Cerqueira-Streit, J.A. (2015). Implications for waste pickers of Distrito Federal, Brazil arising from the obligation of reverse logistics by the National Policy of Solid Waste. Latin American Journal of Management for Sustainable Development, 2(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/LAJMSD.2015.067468
Guarnieri, P., Cerqueira-Streit, J., & Batista, L. (2020). Reverse logistics and the sectoral agreement of packaging industry in Brazil towards a transition to circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104541
IPEA, Institute for Applied Economic Research (2014). VI BRICS Academic Forum.
Jabbour, A.B.L.S., Jabour, C.J.C, Sarkis, J., & Govindan, K. (2014). Brazil's new national policy on solid waste: challenges and opportunities. Clean Technology and Environmental Police, 16(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0600-z
Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
Linder, M.; Williander, M. (2015). Circular business model innovation: inherent uncertainties. Business Strategy and the Environment. 24(7) https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906
Masi, D., Day, S., & Godsell, J. (2017). Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9), 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091602
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (Vol. 2). SAGE Publications.
Nanodkar, S. (2018). Polluter Pays Principle: Essential Element of Environmental Law and Policy. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities. 1(5), 1-8.
Nascimento, D. L. M., Alencastro, V., Quelhas, O. L. G., Caiado, R. G. G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., & Tortorella, G. (2019). Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071
OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2015. Environmental Performance Reviews: Brazil, OECD Publishing, Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/19900090
Pauer, E., Wohner, B., Heinrich, V., & Tacker, M. (2019). Assessing the environmental sustainability of food packaging: An extended life cycle assessment including packaging-related food losses and waste and circularity assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030925
Pereira, A., Ribeiro, F.M., Jeffrey, R., & Doron, A. (2020). Waste policy reforms in developing countries: A comparative study of India and Brazil. Waste Management and Research, 38(9), 987-994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20938435
Rebehy, P.C.P.; Salgado Júnior, A.P.; Ometto, A.R.; Espinoza, D.F.; Rossi, E.; Novi, J.C. (2023). Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in Brazil: Drivers and best practices towards To circular economy based on European Union and BSI. Journal of Cleaner Production, 401, 136591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136591
Ribeiro, F.M., & Kruglianskas, I. (2020). Critical factors for environmental regulation change management: Evidence from an extended producer responsibility case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119013
Roithner, C., & Rechberger, H. (2020). Implementing the dimension of quality into the conventional quantitative definition of recycling rates. Waste Management, 105, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.034
RPB, Reciclar pelo Brasil. (2021). Reciclar pelo Brasil: Plataforma de reciclagem inclusiva. Available in: https://www.reciclarpelobrasil.com.br Accessed in: 7th July, 2022.
Rutkowski, J. E. (2020). Inclusive packaging recycling systems: Improving sustainable waste management for a circular economy. Detritus, 13, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.14037
Sarja, M., Onkila, T., & Mäkelä, M. (2021). A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492
Sehnem, S., Queiroz, A., Pereira, S., Correia, G., & Kuzma, E. (2021). Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2884
Silva, W. D. O., & Morais, D. C. (2021). Transitioning to a circular economy in developing countries: A collaborative approach for sharing responsibilities in solid waste management of a Brazilian craft brewery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128703
Soh, K. L., & Wong, W. P. (2021). Circular economy transition: Exploiting innovative eco-design capabilities and customer involvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128858
Stacey, J., & Rittberger, B. (2003). Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 858–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000148342
Tallentire, C. W., & Steubing, B. (2020). The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe. Waste Management, 103, 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.045
Tirado-soto, M. M., & Zamberlan, F. L. (2013). Networks of recyclable material waste picker’s cooperatives: An alternative for the solid waste management in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Waste Management, 33(4), 1004–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.025
Tolbert, P.S, & Zucker, L.G, 1999. The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1, 169–184. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75038
Traven, L., Kegalj, I., & Sebelja, I. (2018). Management of municipal solid waste in Croatia: Analysis of current practices with performance benchmarking against other European Union member states. Waste Management and Research, 36(8), 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18789058
Wichai-utcha, N., & Chavalparit, O. (2019). 3Rs Policy and plastic waste management in Thailand. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 21(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0781-y
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
RBGI - Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format, linking to RBGI site.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
#RBGI
